Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shannon Hood's avatar

I tend to avoid abridged versions of classics (the exception is Shakespeare!) because there are so many great books to read at each reading “level” that I will just wait until that child is ready to read the real thing. And if it’s hard for them to get into the real thing, I have found that starting it as a read-aloud is enough to get them into it. My daughter was not loving Robinson Crusoe, but when I read it aloud to her for a few chapters, she grew interested in it.

Expand full comment
Alina's avatar

I have mixed feelings about abridged versions after I tried reading a really terrible version of Anne of Green Gables as a child, not realising it wasn't the original. I could have gone through life avoiding LM Montgomery! Luckily a friend recommended the series a few years later and I was outraged to discover her book was quite different.

I think there are cases where abridged versions can be useful but I'd always check the quality of the writing after that experience.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts